Search found 1290 matches
- Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:13 pm
- Forum: Integration Development
- Topic: Custom Business Rules
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1640
Re: Custom Business Rules
(Sorry, I thought I responded last Friday. Too much stuff - not enough time!) Would it be acceptable to have a rule make the H.01 charge amount read-only so no-one can delete it, but you can re-allocate the payees/payors? Said another way, if the charge source is a Loan or Owner's policy with the cr...
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:03 pm
- Forum: Shell (User Interface)
- Topic: Recent Documents
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1116
Re: Recent Documents
Do you mean that you get a different ordering if you run the same query multiple times? Do you have an example?
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:36 pm
- Forum: Integration Development
- Topic: Access to the path denied - IIS 10 on Windows 10
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1051
Re: Access to the path denied - IIS 10 on Windows 10
I don't know if this is related, but did you see this (the response at the bottom of the web page):
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1205 ... pdata-path
or
http://geekswithblogs.net/pabothu/archi ... 11/06.aspx
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1205 ... pdata-path
or
http://geekswithblogs.net/pabothu/archi ... 11/06.aspx
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:23 pm
- Forum: Integration Development
- Topic: Custom Business Rules
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1640
Re: Custom Business Rules
Forgive me but I don't quite understand the root of the question. Under the conditions you stipulate (Simultaneous policy and fixed charge description), when the SI net owner's premium field is calculated, the amount will be appended as a charge on the the line specified underneath (H.01 by default ...
- Mon Dec 21, 2015 11:18 am
- Forum: Integration Development
- Topic: Extracting an attachment regardless of storage mechanism
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1168
Re: Extracting an attachment regardless of storage mechanism
Looks good. Glad you found a work-around.
- Thu Dec 17, 2015 5:24 pm
- Forum: Integration Development
- Topic: Extracting an attachment regardless of storage mechanism
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1168
Re: Extracting an attachment regardless of storage mechanism
I would take the position that this is not a bug since different customers may not want to alias the illegal file path characters in the same way. For example, there is no generally recognized standard conversion for a colon to something less offensive to Windows. However, thanks for pointing out th...
- Tue Dec 15, 2015 11:05 am
- Forum: Integration Development
- Topic: Extracting an attachment regardless of storage mechanism
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1168
Re: Extracting an attachment regardless of storage mechanism
currentOrder.Attachments.Items returns IAttachmentItem objects - not IAttachmentFile objects. Is the Items enumerable passing you an IAttachmentFolder object instead of a file? You should be testing for this.
- Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:45 pm
- Forum: Shell (User Interface)
- Topic: Custom Start Page
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1020
Re: Custom Start Page
We had tried to introduce a way for third parties to provide replacement Start screens. The package would use a registration attribute to place specific tokens in the Select Editors registry area. Unfortunately, there is a bug in this area and you cannot do it at this time. I have submitted a bug re...
- Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:10 am
- Forum: Integration Development
- Topic: Adding New Buttons in SoftPro 4.0
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1794
Re: Adding New Buttons in SoftPro 4.0
I would recommend slowly adding your button UI logic to the new project and see at what point a problem occurs.
- Tue Nov 24, 2015 5:59 pm
- Forum: Server
- Topic: Custom Validation Package - Order.Tasks.CDFLine
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2790
Re: Custom Validation Package - Order.Tasks.CDFLine
If you don't care what the type is, use a dynamic type - that way you don't have to cast it. Besides, the you cannot perform a compile-time cast since the type returned by Select is only known at runtime. It can come from many different sources. How about this? (I also used the TaskStatusType enum s...